return to
Table of Contents
The content of secular morality
If
this whole story about the origins and nature of morality is roughly true, then
our moral rules fundamentally are an attempt to codify the instinctive
attitudes and behaviors that most of us perceive either as good in themselves
or as promoting what is good.
But
if so, what does the genesis of our morality say about its content? Less, perhaps, than we might like – but
quite a bit, nonetheless.
If
we never thought we had any divine revelation, and if we did not already grow
up with a wide variety of moral and behavioral rules inculcated into us by our
parents and by society, and we had to invent the rules based mainly on our own
instincts and experiences, there are probably quite a few general rules most of
us would come up with on our own. Here
are some pretty obvious examples:
Things
to try to do:
·
Love our family members
·
Respect and honor those
who do good things for us and for others
·
Stand up for others
close to us when they are in trouble
·
Tell the truth, most of
the time
·
Treat others in our
community kindly and, where possible, even generously
·
Contribute our share to
the general well-being
·
Send chocolate to your
favorite writer – lots of chocolate
Things
to try not to do:
·
Don’t kill or injure
other people
·
Don’t mess with other
people’s stuff
·
Don’t go out of your way
to incite jealousy, resentment, anger, fear, or doubt
·
Don’t betray a trust
·
Don’t be careless in
ways that might adversely affect others
·
Don’t be needlessly
offensive
You
don’t need God to tell you these things, you don’t need the Ten Commandments to
outline them (among other reasons, because they don’t anyway). You already know these rules, and others
like them, and you could hardly drop them if you wanted to. You can ignore or overrule them at times,
but you can’t take them out of your heart.
It
is hard to say, though, that rules like these are truly “instinctive.” In humans, just about anything that is
instinctive is also affected by our experiences and by our intellectualizations. Perhaps the real genesis of much of our
moral thinking comes from the realization, at some age, that when we either
crave or object to a certain kind of treatment ourselves, other people mostly
feel the same way, and that we are all better off if we each treat others the
way we like to be treated.
It
is probably not necessary to pull the rules apart according to their various
multiple sources. The point is that our
moral sense, however it works and wherever precisely it comes from, brings most
of us to an agreement on points such as those listed above.
Rules
of this sort, by the way, do fit into our whole evolutionary theory. They bind the human community together,
which makes it more effective in surviving and increasing in a pretty hostile
world. Without instincts/rules of this
sort, we would each end up alone, and extremely vulnerable.
So
all the pieces inter-lock: we have a moral sense, and we mostly all agree on
some basic rules, because of the kind of creatures we have evolved into, and
because of the sophistication of our brains.
We can think this way, and we benefit from thinking this way – so we
do. And it is “good” that we do.
This
is “why” we are moral, and “why” we should
be moral. We don’t need God’s law or
divine revelation.
return to
Table of Contents
© 2006 by
C.S. Yanikoski, Harvard, Massachusetts